An analysis of nature versus nurture

Posted on March 16, by Scott Alexander [Epistemic status: Heritable mostly means genes. Shared environmental means anything that two twins have in common — usually parents, siblings, household, and neighborhood.

An analysis of nature versus nurture

Nature VS Nurture debate The nature versus nurture debate started during the s just when sociology was recognized as a part of science. It has been discussed and concluded many times by sociologists, biologists and psychologists with their own opinions.

Biologists and genetic doctors believe that humans inherit and grow according to their biological programming. Many would assume that the genes we were born with would be the ultimate factor for our intelligence and learning habits.

As a study by a team of UCLA scientists in year shows, human intelligence is highly heritable and genetically determined. This is due to the quality of axons in the white matter of the brain is strongly controlled by genetic factors.

The axons are the transmitters and decoders of the external stimulations an individual may come across.

An analysis of nature versus nurture

It shows that the lesser the quality of the axons, the slower the brain develops and matures to fully comprehend complex thoughts and knowledge.

Although proven that biological factors may also play some part in determining human behavior, it is proven that our intelligence can be trained and pushed to higher levels. The newborns involved suffered from maternal and social deprivation.

An analysis of nature versus nurture

They were assigned randomly into two contrasting environments which are the control group, which was left in a rougher and poorer environment and experimental group, which was brought up in a high-quality environment.

According to Heber and his colleagues, all the children from the experimental group had higher IQ than all the children from the control group, when the children left the study at age of six. To further prove that socialization is the main factor of human behavior, the same children were tested again at the age 14 and all were found to be performing in school as such a child with a mean IQ of 80 would, despite the previous achievements during the programme which shows that the human brain develops according how it was taught and socialized.

For this reason, Professor Arthur Jensen said that this programme does not produce permanent intelligence gain which further demonstrates the importance of socialization. Hence, it is concluded that our degree of intelligence are strongly affected by our primary and secondary socialization and that our IQ would probably deteriorate if we stopped socializing.

Psychologists claim that the main determinant of human behavior is the cognitive programming of the human mind. The widely-known theory of the three parts of the mind, superego, ego and id was first brought up by Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud.

He analyzed that there are three parts of the human mind, the id, superego and ego. The id is the part that we were born with, the part of the mind where our basic instincts are.

This part of the human conscious displays our true desires and wants. The next part that matures is the ego. The ego is based on the reality principle. It balances the needs of our id while helping us keeps our head on the situation of reality. Lastly, our superego develops at the age of five.

This is the part of our mind where our moral values and conscience exists. After this final part matures, our brain becomes capable of practical thought and consideration. This is however a self-contradicting argument.

In order for the three components of the brain to mature, they had to go through a series of primary socialization.

The superego is the best example to prove that part of the brain develops and acts due to socialization. The superego is a state of mind where the norms and values of society are stored.

Therefore, it is reasoned that the act and state of mind is mostly social constructed. Sociologists came up with the latest opinion of all three sides to the argument, that human behavior is nurtured and altering every time socialization takes place. This side believes that the predetermined factors only lay a foundation for the interaction with the external society and other individuals to trigger human behaviour.

Without proper socialization, humans cannot learn to behave appropriately to fit in.Nature Vs Nurture Essay Maggie Kent 3/27/14 Child Development p.3 NatureNurture Nature vs. Nurture There is a constant battle between researchers from different fields saying almost all traits come from genetic makeup and that traits are based off of the environment a person is living in.

When it comes down to the argument of nature versus nurture, there is no clear answer. Body paragraph 3 - Compare & contrast analysis; Conclusion; References; It is a structure of a 5-paragraph essay on nature vs nurture. How about a research paper on the same topic?

Here you go: 30 Nature versus Nurture Essay Topics You May Consider. To make your life easier, we will provide some of the nature vs nurture essay ideas . The nature versus nurture debate is about the causes of differences between people..

Like all living things, people have inherited innate qualities. There are also events or experiences which happen during life. 'Nature' describes the effect of a person's genes, whereas 'nurture' describes whatever happens during life.. In the language of population genetics, the heritability of a feature is.

In the past, debates over the relative contributions of nature versus nurture often took a very one-sided approach, with one side arguing that nature played the most important role and the other side suggesting that it was nurture that was the most significant.

The nature versus nurture debate involves whether human behaviour is determined by the environment, Using kinematic analysis, the results of the experiment were that the twin foetuses would interact with each other for longer periods and more often as the pregnancies went on.

Researchers were able to conclude that the performance of. I think you mean stative verb. In a nutshell the infinitive verbs are verbs that describe action. Stative verbs describe being.

The way English and Spanish handle the infinitive is very different and the following site does a good job of explaining this difference.

NATURE VS. NURTURE: Analysis of Nature vs. Nurture (UPDATED)